Difference between revisions of "CeC Simulation Meeting"

From CASE
Jump to: navigation, search
(Meeting Agenda)
(Meeting Agenda)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
==Meeting Agenda==
 
==Meeting Agenda==
 
+
* 01/19/2018:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_1_19_2018_Gang.pdf|Genesis simulation of FEL amplifier with undulators consisting of 3 subsections]],  by Gang Wang;
 +
* 10/27/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_10_27_2017_Jun.pdf|Kicker simulations (Cooling kick is traced for three ions with reference energy and 0.03% off. The ions with energy errors are aligned with wave-packet according to R56. The phase slips inside kicker are still large. The kick to the on-energy ion is significant.)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
* 10/20/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_10_20_2017_Jun_1.pdf|Kicker simulations (Peak current is increased to 25 A and gain at ion is 60. Cooling kick is traced for three ions with reference energy and 0.1% off. The ions with 0.1% energy errors are arbitrarily put into the wave-packet, not according to R56)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
** [[media:Meeting_10_20_2017_Jun_2.pdf|Dipole simulations]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
* 09/29/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_09_29_2017_Jun.pdf|Kicker simulations (The problem with growing emittance is resolved. The peak current is also reduced to 23 A (gain is 40 at ion). Kick to ion is calculated. Substantial phase slip of ion w.r.t. wave-packets inside kicker is found.)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
** [[media:Meeting_09_29_2017_Jun_oc.pdf|Orbit control tool]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
* 09/14/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_09_14_2017_Jun.pdf|Kicker simulations (Kicker is treated as a drift section, i.e. no quads. The beam size does no grow linearly and the emittance grows significantly, indicating some problems with the codes.)]],  by Jun Ma;
 
* 09/07/2017:  
 
* 09/07/2017:  
** [[media:Meeting_09_07_2017_Jun.pdf|CeC simulations (Start to end simulation with reduced beam current, 40A->31A. The gain at ion is ~140. The optimal lattice functions at undulator are found with space charge effects taken into account.)]],  by Jun Ma;
+
** [[media:Meeting_09_07_2017_Jun.pdf|CeC simulations (Modulator and FEL simulation with reduced beam current, 40A->31A. The gain at ion is ~140. The optimal lattice functions at undulator are found with space charge effects taken into account.)]],  by Jun Ma;
 
* 08/31/2017:  
 
* 08/31/2017:  
** [[media:Meeting_08_31_2017_Jun.pdf|CeC simulations (Start to end simulation with not-so-matched beam at undulator entrance, beta functions are a factor of two larger. The intention is to see to what extent the beam has to be matched. Current is too large and FEL saturated)]],  by Jun Ma;
+
** [[media:Meeting_08_31_2017_Jun.pdf|CeC simulations (Modulator and FEL simulation with not-so-matched beam at undulator entrance, beta functions are a factor of two larger. The intention is to see to what extent the beam has to be matched. Current is too large and FEL saturated)]],  by Jun Ma;
 
* 08/17/2017:  
 
* 08/17/2017:  
 
** [[media:Meeting_08_17_2017_Jun.pdf|Quadrupoles (Attempts to optimize quadrupoles in modulator so that beam is matched to FEL. The target lattice function does not take into account space charge effects along undulator)]],  by Jun Ma;
 
** [[media:Meeting_08_17_2017_Jun.pdf|Quadrupoles (Attempts to optimize quadrupoles in modulator so that beam is matched to FEL. The target lattice function does not take into account space charge effects along undulator)]],  by Jun Ma;

Latest revision as of 20:56, 16 February 2018

Meeting Goals

The CeC simulation meeting is focused on developing simulation as well as analytical tools to advance understandings of coherent electron cooling (CeC).

Meeting Agenda