Difference between revisions of "CeC Simulation Meeting"

From CASE
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Meeting Agenda)
(→‎Meeting Agenda)
 
(44 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
==Meeting Agenda==
 
==Meeting Agenda==
 +
* 01/19/2018:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_1_19_2018_Gang.pdf|Genesis simulation of FEL amplifier with undulators consisting of 3 subsections]],  by Gang Wang;
 +
* 10/27/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_10_27_2017_Jun.pdf|Kicker simulations (Cooling kick is traced for three ions with reference energy and 0.03% off. The ions with energy errors are aligned with wave-packet according to R56. The phase slips inside kicker are still large. The kick to the on-energy ion is significant.)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
* 10/20/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_10_20_2017_Jun_1.pdf|Kicker simulations (Peak current is increased to 25 A and gain at ion is 60. Cooling kick is traced for three ions with reference energy and 0.1% off. The ions with 0.1% energy errors are arbitrarily put into the wave-packet, not according to R56)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
** [[media:Meeting_10_20_2017_Jun_2.pdf|Dipole simulations]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
* 09/29/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_09_29_2017_Jun.pdf|Kicker simulations (The problem with growing emittance is resolved. The peak current is also reduced to 23 A (gain is 40 at ion). Kick to ion is calculated. Substantial phase slip of ion w.r.t. wave-packets inside kicker is found.)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
** [[media:Meeting_09_29_2017_Jun_oc.pdf|Orbit control tool]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
* 09/14/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_09_14_2017_Jun.pdf|Kicker simulations (Kicker is treated as a drift section, i.e. no quads. The beam size does no grow linearly and the emittance grows significantly, indicating some problems with the codes.)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
* 09/07/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_09_07_2017_Jun.pdf|CeC simulations (Modulator and FEL simulation with reduced beam current, 40A->31A. The gain at ion is ~140. The optimal lattice functions at undulator are found with space charge effects taken into account.)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
* 08/31/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_08_31_2017_Jun.pdf|CeC simulations (Modulator and FEL simulation with not-so-matched beam at undulator entrance, beta functions are a factor of two larger. The intention is to see to what extent the beam has to be matched. Current is too large and FEL saturated)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
* 08/17/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_08_17_2017_Jun.pdf|Quadrupoles (Attempts to optimize quadrupoles in modulator so that beam is matched to FEL. The target lattice function does not take into account space charge effects along undulator)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
* 07/20/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_07_20_2017_Jun.pdf|Modulator simulation(New energy with gamma=28.7, not matched to FEL due to space charge effects)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
* 04/06/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_04_06_2017_Jun.pdf|Start-to-end CeC simulation (using smoothed parameters from raw particle distribution, beam not matched to FEL, see beam variation in wiggler from below plot)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
** [[media:Meeting_04_06_2017_Jun_1.png|Transverse beam size variation along undulator for the simulation results shown in above slides]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
* 03/16/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_03_16_2017_Jun.pdf|Start-to-end CeC simulation (using direct parameters from raw particle distribution via beam dynamics simulation, not much lasing observed)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
* 03/02/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_03_02_2017_Igor.pdf|Physics Applications in Matlab]],  by Igor Pinayev;
 +
** [[media:Meeting_03_02_2017_Irina.pdf|Updates on Multipacting Simulations]],  by Irina Petrushina;
 +
* 02/16/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_02_16_2017_Gang.pdf|Discussion of Jun's result (attempt to explain the 'crossing' in vx-x plot, local 'repulsion' not explained)]],  by Gang Wang;
 +
* 02/02/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_02_02_2017_Jun.pdf|Study of phase advance in quads]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
** [[media:Meeting_02_02_2017_Igor.pdf|Preliminary CeC schedule]],  by Igor Pinayev;
 +
* 01/19/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_01_19_2017_Gang.pdf|Discussion of Jun's results (Analytical formula to calculate vx)]],  by Gang Wang;
 +
** [[media:Meeting_01_19_2017_Gang2.pdf|Mathcad spreadsheet to calculate vx and a simple estimate to explain the difference at y=0 and y=0.5sigma]],  by Gang Wang;
 +
* 01/12/2017:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_01_12_2017_Jun.pdf|Phase advance in quads with space charge (Continued studies about reversed slope)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
** [[media:Meeting_01_12_2017_Igor.pdf|Optimization of laser spot on cathode]],  by Igor Pinayev;
 +
** [[media:Meeting_01_12_2017_Kentaro.pdf|Tomographic Measurement]],  by Kentaro Mihara;
 +
* 12/22/2016:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_12_22_2016_Gang.pdf|Closer look at Jun's results (Possible reason about not observing reversed slope for continuous focusing channel)]],  by Gang Wang;
 +
* 12/15/2016:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_12_15_2016_Jun.pdf|Phase advance in quads (Further simulation studies on the reversed slope)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
* 12/08/2016:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_12_08_2016_Jing.pdf|CeC simulation status and forward (summary of the beam dynamic simulation status)]],  by Yichao Jing;
 +
* 12/01/2016:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_12_01_2016.pdf|Modulator simulations (More 2D plots for continuous focusing, some results for analyzing the reversed slope)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
** [[media:Meeting_12_01_2016_wang_1.pdf|Mathcad spreadsheet-a possible explanation of the reversed slope in <vx> ]],  by Gang Wang;
 +
* 11/10/2016:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_11_10_2016.pdf|Modulator simulations with linear focusing(added results for moving ion)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
** [[media:Meeting_11_10_2016_continued.pdf|Modulator simulations with quadruple focusing(unexplained reverse slope for <vx> modulation)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
* 10/27/2016:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_10_27_2016.pdf|Modulator simulations with focusing field (Linear focusing plus space charge compensating field, quadruple focusing)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
* 09/29/2016:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_09_29_2016.pdf|Particle initialization and focusing field (benchmarked with MAD-X)]],  by Jun Ma;
 +
* 09/15/2016:
 +
** [[media:Meeting_09_15_2016.pdf|Modulator simulation (preparation for paper)]],  by Jun Ma;
 
* 09/01/2016:  
 
* 09/01/2016:  
−
** [[media:Meeting_09_01_2016_revised.pdf|Start-to-end CeC simulation (first meaningful results)]],  by Jun Ma;
+
** [[media:Meeting_09_01_2016.pdf|Start-to-end CeC simulation (first meaningful results)]],  by Jun Ma;
 
* 08/18/2016:  
 
* 08/18/2016:  
 
** [[media:Meeting_08_18_2016.pdf|Start-to-end CeC simulation(saturated due to small number of macro-particles in the slice containing ion)]],  by Jun Ma;
 
** [[media:Meeting_08_18_2016.pdf|Start-to-end CeC simulation(saturated due to small number of macro-particles in the slice containing ion)]],  by Jun Ma;

Latest revision as of 20:56, 16 February 2018

Meeting Goals

The CeC simulation meeting is focused on developing simulation as well as analytical tools to advance understandings of coherent electron cooling (CeC).

Meeting Agenda

Retrieved from "http://case.physics.stonybrook.edu/index.php?title=CeC_Simulation_Meeting&oldid=2199"