Difference between revisions of "CeC Simulation Meeting"
From CASE
(→Meeting Agenda) |
(→Meeting Agenda) |
||
| (24 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Meeting Agenda== | ==Meeting Agenda== | ||
| + | * 01/19/2018: | ||
| + | ** [[media:Meeting_1_19_2018_Gang.pdf|Genesis simulation of FEL amplifier with undulators consisting of 3 subsections]], by Gang Wang; | ||
| + | * 10/27/2017: | ||
| + | ** [[media:Meeting_10_27_2017_Jun.pdf|Kicker simulations (Cooling kick is traced for three ions with reference energy and 0.03% off. The ions with energy errors are aligned with wave-packet according to R56. The phase slips inside kicker are still large. The kick to the on-energy ion is significant.)]], by Jun Ma; | ||
| + | * 10/20/2017: | ||
| + | ** [[media:Meeting_10_20_2017_Jun_1.pdf|Kicker simulations (Peak current is increased to 25 A and gain at ion is 60. Cooling kick is traced for three ions with reference energy and 0.1% off. The ions with 0.1% energy errors are arbitrarily put into the wave-packet, not according to R56)]], by Jun Ma; | ||
| + | ** [[media:Meeting_10_20_2017_Jun_2.pdf|Dipole simulations]], by Jun Ma; | ||
| + | * 09/29/2017: | ||
| + | ** [[media:Meeting_09_29_2017_Jun.pdf|Kicker simulations (The problem with growing emittance is resolved. The peak current is also reduced to 23 A (gain is 40 at ion). Kick to ion is calculated. Substantial phase slip of ion w.r.t. wave-packets inside kicker is found.)]], by Jun Ma; | ||
| + | ** [[media:Meeting_09_29_2017_Jun_oc.pdf|Orbit control tool]], by Jun Ma; | ||
| + | * 09/14/2017: | ||
| + | ** [[media:Meeting_09_14_2017_Jun.pdf|Kicker simulations (Kicker is treated as a drift section, i.e. no quads. The beam size does no grow linearly and the emittance grows significantly, indicating some problems with the codes.)]], by Jun Ma; | ||
| + | * 09/07/2017: | ||
| + | ** [[media:Meeting_09_07_2017_Jun.pdf|CeC simulations (Modulator and FEL simulation with reduced beam current, 40A->31A. The gain at ion is ~140. The optimal lattice functions at undulator are found with space charge effects taken into account.)]], by Jun Ma; | ||
| + | * 08/31/2017: | ||
| + | ** [[media:Meeting_08_31_2017_Jun.pdf|CeC simulations (Modulator and FEL simulation with not-so-matched beam at undulator entrance, beta functions are a factor of two larger. The intention is to see to what extent the beam has to be matched. Current is too large and FEL saturated)]], by Jun Ma; | ||
| + | * 08/17/2017: | ||
| + | ** [[media:Meeting_08_17_2017_Jun.pdf|Quadrupoles (Attempts to optimize quadrupoles in modulator so that beam is matched to FEL. The target lattice function does not take into account space charge effects along undulator)]], by Jun Ma; | ||
| + | * 07/20/2017: | ||
| + | ** [[media:Meeting_07_20_2017_Jun.pdf|Modulator simulation(New energy with gamma=28.7, not matched to FEL due to space charge effects)]], by Jun Ma; | ||
| + | * 04/06/2017: | ||
| + | ** [[media:Meeting_04_06_2017_Jun.pdf|Start-to-end CeC simulation (using smoothed parameters from raw particle distribution, beam not matched to FEL, see beam variation in wiggler from below plot)]], by Jun Ma; | ||
| + | ** [[media:Meeting_04_06_2017_Jun_1.png|Transverse beam size variation along undulator for the simulation results shown in above slides]], by Jun Ma; | ||
| + | * 03/16/2017: | ||
| + | ** [[media:Meeting_03_16_2017_Jun.pdf|Start-to-end CeC simulation (using direct parameters from raw particle distribution via beam dynamics simulation, not much lasing observed)]], by Jun Ma; | ||
* 03/02/2017: | * 03/02/2017: | ||
** [[media:Meeting_03_02_2017_Igor.pdf|Physics Applications in Matlab]], by Igor Pinayev; | ** [[media:Meeting_03_02_2017_Igor.pdf|Physics Applications in Matlab]], by Igor Pinayev; | ||
Latest revision as of 20:56, 16 February 2018
Meeting Goals
The CeC simulation meeting is focused on developing simulation as well as analytical tools to advance understandings of coherent electron cooling (CeC).
Meeting Agenda
- 01/19/2018:
- 10/27/2017:
- 10/20/2017:
- 09/29/2017:
- 09/14/2017:
- 09/07/2017:
- 08/31/2017:
- 08/17/2017:
- 07/20/2017:
- 04/06/2017:
- 03/16/2017:
- 03/02/2017:
- Physics Applications in Matlab, by Igor Pinayev;
- Updates on Multipacting Simulations, by Irina Petrushina;
- 02/16/2017:
- 02/02/2017:
- Study of phase advance in quads, by Jun Ma;
- Preliminary CeC schedule, by Igor Pinayev;
- 01/19/2017:
- 01/12/2017:
- Phase advance in quads with space charge (Continued studies about reversed slope), by Jun Ma;
- Optimization of laser spot on cathode, by Igor Pinayev;
- Tomographic Measurement, by Kentaro Mihara;
- 12/22/2016:
- 12/15/2016:
- 12/08/2016:
- 12/01/2016:
- 11/10/2016:
- 10/27/2016:
- 09/29/2016:
- 09/15/2016:
- Modulator simulation (preparation for paper), by Jun Ma;
- 09/01/2016:
- 08/18/2016:
- 08/04/2016:
- 07/21/2016:
- 07/07/2016:
- 06/09/2016:
- 05/26/2016:
- 04/28/2016:
- 04/14/2016:
- Comparison of modulator simulation with theory , by Jun Ma;
- 03/31/2016:
- 03/17/2016:
- Modulator and wiggler Simulation , by Jun Ma;
- 03/03/2016:
- 02/18/2016:
- Modulator Simulation (open boundary condition) , by Jun Ma;
- 01/21/2016:
- Modulator Simulation (open boundary condition) , by Jun Ma;
- CeC electron linac simulation , by Yuan Hui Wu
- 01/07/2016:
- Comparing Modulator Simulation With Theory , by Gang Wang;
- 12/10/2015:
- Modulator and Wiggler Simulation, by Jun Ma;
- Analytical Solution of Fokker-Planck Equation, by Gang Wang
- 10/8/2015:
- Beam Simulations with ASTRA, by Igor Pinayev
